Harmonization summary
3,339 label-stable codes
- Label changes detected
- 10
- Multiple dataset contexts
- 217
- Unique codes
- 3,556
- Enriched codes in this report
- 2
Praxis Data Lab · Variable History
Variable history and harmonization report.
Review variable definitions, cycle chronology, survey design, laboratory methods, method-change boundaries, detection limits, and evidence-backed harmonization actions.
3,556matching variable codes
3,961 release records across 133 datasets and 1 cycles.
Search scope
Filtered NHANES variable history
Cycle: 2017-2020.
Scientific safeguard
Qualified assessment is authoritative; chronology remains supporting evidence.
Praxis separates source-stated method or instrument changes from automated differences in CDC/NCHS method text. The qualified harmonization assessment below is the researcher-facing conclusion; method chronology explains the underlying evidence and does not override that adjudication.
Variable-by-variable chronology
Qualified harmonization assessment and indexed evidence
Each variable first shows the current qualified assessment used by Study Builder, followed by cycle-specific source evidence and method chronology.
ACD011ACompatible with harmonization
What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ACQ — What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home? — Acculturation (Questionnaire)
ACD011BCompatible with harmonization
What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ACQ — What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home? — Acculturation (Questionnaire)
ACD011CCompatible with harmonization
What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ACQ — What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home? — Acculturation (Questionnaire)
ACD040Compatible with harmonization
Now I'm going to ask you about language use. What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home? {Do you/Does he/Does she} speak only Spanish, more Spanish than English, both equally, more English than Spanish, or only English?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
Variable names / labels over time
- Now I'm going to ask you about language use. What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home? {Do you/Does he/Does she} speak only Spanish, more Spanish than English, both equally, more English than Spanish, or only English? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ACQ — Now I'm going to ask you about language use. What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home? {Do you/Does he/Does she} speak only Spanish, more Spanish than English, both equally, more English than Spanish, or only English? — Acculturation (Questionnaire)
ACD110Compatible with harmonization
{Do you/Does SP} speak only (NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE), more (NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE) than English, both equally, more English than (NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE), or only English?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- {Do you/Does SP} speak only (NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE), more (NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE) than English, both equally, more English than (NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE), or only English? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ACQ — {Do you/Does SP} speak only (NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE), more (NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE) than English, both equally, more English than (NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE), or only English? — Acculturation (Questionnaire)
AGQ030Compatible with harmonization
During the past 12 months, {have you/has SP} had an episode of hay fever?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- During the past 12 months, {have you/has SP} had an episode of hay fever? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_MCQ — During the past 12 months, {have you/has SP} had an episode of hay fever? — Medical Conditions (Questionnaire)
AIALANGACompatible with harmonization
Language of the MEC ACASI Interview Instrument
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Demographics
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Language of the MEC ACASI Interview Instrument — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_DEMO — Language of the MEC ACASI Interview Instrument — Demographic Variables and Sample Weights (Demographics)
ALD020Compatible with harmonization
During your life, on how many days have you had at least one drink of alcohol?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- During your life, on how many days have you had at least one drink of alcohol? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQY_R — During your life, on how many days have you had at least one drink of alcohol? — Alcohol Use - Youth (Questionnaire) — Note: RDC Only
ALD030Compatible with harmonization
During the past 30 days, on how many days did you have at least one drink of alcohol?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- During the past 30 days, on how many days did you have at least one drink of alcohol? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQY_R — During the past 30 days, on how many days did you have at least one drink of alcohol? — Alcohol Use - Youth (Questionnaire) — Note: RDC Only
ALD040Compatible with harmonization
During the past 30 days, on how many days did you have {'4' Female, '5' Male - DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks of alcohol in a row, that is, within a couple of hours?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- During the past 30 days, on how many days did you have {'4' Female, '5' Male - DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks of alcohol in a row, that is, within a couple of hours? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQY_R — During the past 30 days, on how many days did you have {'4' Female, '5' Male - DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks of alcohol in a row, that is, within a couple of hours? — Alcohol Use - Youth (Questionnaire) — Note: RDC Only
ALQ010Compatible with harmonization
How old were you when you had your first drink of alcohol, other than a few sips?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How old were you when you had your first drink of alcohol, other than a few sips? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQY_R — How old were you when you had your first drink of alcohol, other than a few sips? — Alcohol Use - Youth (Questionnaire) — Note: RDC Only
ALQ111Compatible with harmonization
The next questions are about drinking alcoholic beverages. Included are liquor (such as whiskey or gin), beer, wine, wine coolers, and any other type of alcoholic beverage. In {your/SP's} entire life, {have you/has he/has she} had at least 1 drink of any kind of alcohol, not counting small tastes or sips? By a drink, I mean a 12 oz. beer, a 5 oz. glass of wine, or one and a half ounces of liquor.
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- The next questions are about drinking alcoholic beverages. Included are liquor (such as whiskey or gin), beer, wine, wine coolers, and any other type of alcoholic beverage. In {your/SP's} entire life, {have you/has he/has she} had at least 1 drink of any kind of alcohol, not counting small tastes or sips? By a drink, I mean a 12 oz. beer, a 5 oz. glass of wine, or one and a half ounces of liquor. — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQ — The next questions are about drinking alcoholic beverages. Included are liquor (such as whiskey or gin), beer, wine, wine coolers, and any other type of alcoholic beverage. In {your/SP's} entire life, {have you/has he/has she} had at least 1 drink of any kind of alcohol, not counting small tastes or sips? By a drink, I mean a 12 oz. beer, a 5 oz. glass of wine, or one and a half ounces of liquor. — Alcohol Use (Questionnaire)
ALQ121Compatible with harmonization
During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} drink any type of alcoholic beverage? PROBE: How many days per week, per month, or per year did {you/SP} drink?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} drink any type of alcoholic beverage? PROBE: How many days per week, per month, or per year did {you/SP} drink? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQ — During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} drink any type of alcoholic beverage? PROBE: How many days per week, per month, or per year did {you/SP} drink? — Alcohol Use (Questionnaire)
ALQ130Compatible with harmonization
During the past 12 months, on those days that {you/SP} drank alcoholic beverages, on the average, how many drinks did {you/he/she} have? By a drink, I mean a 12 oz. beer, a 5 oz. glass of wine, or one and a half ounces of liquor.)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
Variable names / labels over time
- During the past 12 months, on those days that {you/SP} drank alcoholic beverages, on the average, how many drinks did {you/he/she} have? By a drink, I mean a 12 oz. beer, a 5 oz. glass of wine, or one and a half ounces of liquor.) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQ — During the past 12 months, on those days that {you/SP} drank alcoholic beverages, on the average, how many drinks did {you/he/she} have? By a drink, I mean a 12 oz. beer, a 5 oz. glass of wine, or one and a half ounces of liquor.) — Alcohol Use (Questionnaire)
ALQ142Compatible with harmonization
During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} have {DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks of any alcoholic beverage? PROBE: How many days per week, per month, or per year did {you/SP} have {DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks in a single day?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} have {DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks of any alcoholic beverage? PROBE: How many days per week, per month, or per year did {you/SP} have {DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks in a single day? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQ — During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} have {DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks of any alcoholic beverage? PROBE: How many days per week, per month, or per year did {you/SP} have {DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks in a single day? — Alcohol Use (Questionnaire)
ALQ151Compatible with harmonization
Was there ever a time or times in {your/SP's} life when {you/he/she} drank {DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks of any kind of alcoholic beverage almost every day?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Was there ever a time or times in {your/SP's} life when {you/he/she} drank {DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks of any kind of alcoholic beverage almost every day? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQ — Was there ever a time or times in {your/SP's} life when {you/he/she} drank {DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks of any kind of alcoholic beverage almost every day? — Alcohol Use (Questionnaire)
ALQ170Compatible with harmonization
Considering all types of alcoholic beverages, during the past 30 days, how many times did you have {5/4} or more drinks on an occasion?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Considering all types of alcoholic beverages, during the past 30 days, how many times did you have {5/4} or more drinks on an occasion? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQ — Considering all types of alcoholic beverages, during the past 30 days, how many times did you have {5/4} or more drinks on an occasion? — Alcohol Use (Questionnaire)
ALQ270Compatible with harmonization
During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} have {DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks in a period of two hours or less?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} have {DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks in a period of two hours or less? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQ — During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} have {DISPLAY NUMBER} or more drinks in a period of two hours or less? — Alcohol Use (Questionnaire)
ALQ280Compatible with harmonization
During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} have 8 or more drinks in a single day?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} have 8 or more drinks in a single day? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQ — During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} have 8 or more drinks in a single day? — Alcohol Use (Questionnaire)
ALQ290Compatible with harmonization
During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} have 12 or more drinks in a single day?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} have 12 or more drinks in a single day? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_ALQ — During the past 12 months, about how often did {you/SP} have 12 or more drinks in a single day? — Alcohol Use (Questionnaire)
AUAEARCompatible with harmonization
Which ear tested first?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Which ear tested first? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Which ear tested first? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUAEXCMTCompatible with harmonization
Comment code for an Audio Exam
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Comment code for an Audio Exam — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Comment code for an Audio Exam — Audiometry (Examination)
AUAEXSTSCompatible with harmonization
Status of an Audiometry Exam
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Status of an Audiometry Exam — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Status of an Audiometry Exam — Audiometry (Examination)
AUAFMANLCompatible with harmonization
Frequency at Which Switched From Auto to Manual Audio Testing (Left)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Frequency at Which Switched From Auto to Manual Audio Testing (Left) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Frequency at Which Switched From Auto to Manual Audio Testing (Left) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUAFMANRCompatible with harmonization
Frequency at Which Switched From Auto to Manual Audio Testing (Right)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Frequency at Which Switched From Auto to Manual Audio Testing (Right) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Frequency at Which Switched From Auto to Manual Audio Testing (Right) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUALEQCCompatible with harmonization
Quality Code for Tympanogram of Left Ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Quality Code for Tympanogram of Left Ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Quality Code for Tympanogram of Left Ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUAMODECompatible with harmonization
Mode of Audiometric Test (Manual/Automatic/Mixed)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Mode of Audiometric Test (Manual/Automatic/Mixed) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Mode of Audiometric Test (Manual/Automatic/Mixed) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUAREQCCompatible with harmonization
Quality Code for Tympanogram of Right Ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Quality Code for Tympanogram of Right Ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Quality Code for Tympanogram of Right Ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUATYMTLCompatible with harmonization
Tympanogram Type, Left Ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Tympanogram Type, Left Ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Tympanogram Type, Left Ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUATYMTRCompatible with harmonization
Tympanogram Type, Right Ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Tympanogram Type, Right Ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Tympanogram Type, Right Ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUDLOABCCompatible with harmonization
Other Exam Abnormality, Left, Comment
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Other Exam Abnormality, Left, Comment — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Other Exam Abnormality, Left, Comment — Audiometry (Examination)
AUDROABCCompatible with harmonization
Other Exam Abnormality, Right, Comment
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
Variable names / labels over time
- Other Exam Abnormality, Right, Comment — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Other Exam Abnormality, Right, Comment — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ010Compatible with harmonization
Do you now have a tube in your right or left ear? (If yes, indicate affected ear(s))
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Do you now have a tube in your right or left ear? (If yes, indicate affected ear(s)) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Do you now have a tube in your right or left ear? (If yes, indicate affected ear(s)) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ011Compatible with harmonization
Do you now have a tube in your right or left ear? (If yes, indicate affected ear(s))
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Do you now have a tube in your right or left ear? (If yes, indicate affected ear(s)) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Do you now have a tube in your right or left ear? (If yes, indicate affected ear(s)) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ020Compatible with harmonization
Have you had a cold, sinus problem, or earache in the last 24 hours?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you had a cold, sinus problem, or earache in the last 24 hours? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you had a cold, sinus problem, or earache in the last 24 hours? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ020ACompatible with harmonization
Have you had a cold in the last 24 hours?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you had a cold in the last 24 hours? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you had a cold in the last 24 hours? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ020BCompatible with harmonization
Have you had a sinus problem in the last 24 hours?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you had a sinus problem in the last 24 hours? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you had a sinus problem in the last 24 hours? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ020CCompatible with harmonization
Have you had an earache in the right ear in the last 24 hours?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you had an earache in the right ear in the last 24 hours? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you had an earache in the right ear in the last 24 hours? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ020DCompatible with harmonization
Have you had an earache in left ear in the last 24 hours?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you had an earache in left ear in the last 24 hours? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you had an earache in left ear in the last 24 hours? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ020ECompatible with harmonization
Have you had an earache in both ears in the last 24 hours?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you had an earache in both ears in the last 24 hours? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you had an earache in both ears in the last 24 hours? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ031Compatible with harmonization
In the past 24 hours, have you been exposed to noise so loud that you would have had to raise your voice to speak to someone an arm's length away?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- In the past 24 hours, have you been exposed to noise so loud that you would have had to raise your voice to speak to someone an arm's length away? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — In the past 24 hours, have you been exposed to noise so loud that you would have had to raise your voice to speak to someone an arm's length away? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ041Compatible with harmonization
How many hours ago did the noise end?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How many hours ago did the noise end? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — How many hours ago did the noise end? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ050Compatible with harmonization
Do you hear better in one ear than the other?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Do you hear better in one ear than the other? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Do you hear better in one ear than the other? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ051Compatible with harmonization
Is it easier for you to hear out of one ear than the other?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Is it easier for you to hear out of one ear than the other? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Is it easier for you to hear out of one ear than the other? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ054Compatible with harmonization
These next questions are about {your/SP's} hearing. Which statement best describes {your/SP's} hearing (without a hearing aid, personal sound amplifier, or other listening devices)? Would you say {your/his/her} hearing is excellent, good, that {you have/s/he has} a little trouble, moderate trouble, a lot of trouble, or {are you/is s/he} deaf?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- These next questions are about {your/SP's} hearing. Which statement best describes {your/SP's} hearing (without a hearing aid, personal sound amplifier, or other listening devices)? Would you say {your/his/her} hearing is excellent, good, that {you have/s/he has} a little trouble, moderate trouble, a lot of trouble, or {are you/is s/he} deaf? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — These next questions are about {your/SP's} hearing. Which statement best describes {your/SP's} hearing (without a hearing aid, personal sound amplifier, or other listening devices)? Would you say {your/his/her} hearing is excellent, good, that {you have/s/he has} a little trouble, moderate trouble, a lot of trouble, or {are you/is s/he} deaf? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ060Compatible with harmonization
These next questions refer to hearing without the use of a hearing aid or any other listening devices. If {you have/SP has} one ear that is better than the other, please answer the questions for the hearing in {your/SP's} better ear. Can {you/SP} usually hear and understand what a person says without seeing his or her face if that person whispers to {you/him/her} from across a quiet room?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- These next questions refer to hearing without the use of a hearing aid or any other listening devices. If {you have/SP has} one ear that is better than the other, please answer the questions for the hearing in {your/SP's} better ear. Can {you/SP} usually hear and understand what a person says without seeing his or her face if that person whispers to {you/him/her} from across a quiet room? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — These next questions refer to hearing without the use of a hearing aid or any other listening devices. If {you have/SP has} one ear that is better than the other, please answer the questions for the hearing in {your/SP's} better ear. Can {you/SP} usually hear and understand what a person says without seeing his or her face if that person whispers to {you/him/her} from across a quiet room? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ070Compatible with harmonization
Can {you/SP} usually hear and understand what a person says without seeing his or her face if that person talks in a normal voice to {you/him/her} from across a quiet room?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Can {you/SP} usually hear and understand what a person says without seeing his or her face if that person talks in a normal voice to {you/him/her} from across a quiet room? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Can {you/SP} usually hear and understand what a person says without seeing his or her face if that person talks in a normal voice to {you/him/her} from across a quiet room? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ080Compatible with harmonization
Can {you/SP} usually hear and understand what a person says without seeing his or her face if that person shouts to {you/him/her} from across a quiet room?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Can {you/SP} usually hear and understand what a person says without seeing his or her face if that person shouts to {you/him/her} from across a quiet room? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Can {you/SP} usually hear and understand what a person says without seeing his or her face if that person shouts to {you/him/her} from across a quiet room? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ090Compatible with harmonization
Can{you/SP} usually hear and understand what a person says without seeing his or her face if that person speaks loudly into {your/his/her} better ear?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Can{you/SP} usually hear and understand what a person says without seeing his or her face if that person speaks loudly into {your/his/her} better ear? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Can{you/SP} usually hear and understand what a person says without seeing his or her face if that person speaks loudly into {your/his/her} better ear? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ101Compatible with harmonization
How often {do you/does SP} have difficulty hearing and understanding if there is background noise, for example, when other people are talking, TV or radio is on, or children are playing? Would you say...
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How often {do you/does SP} have difficulty hearing and understanding if there is background noise, for example, when other people are talking, TV or radio is on, or children are playing? Would you say... — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — How often {do you/does SP} have difficulty hearing and understanding if there is background noise, for example, when other people are talking, TV or radio is on, or children are playing? Would you say... — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ110Compatible with harmonization
How often does {your/SP's} hearing cause {you/him/her}to feel frustrated when talking to members of {your/his/her} family or to friends? Would you say...
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How often does {your/SP's} hearing cause {you/him/her}to feel frustrated when talking to members of {your/his/her} family or to friends? Would you say... — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — How often does {your/SP's} hearing cause {you/him/her}to feel frustrated when talking to members of {your/his/her} family or to friends? Would you say... — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ139Compatible with harmonization
{Have you/Has SP} ever had a tube placed in {your/his/her} ear to drain the fluid from {your/his/her} ear or to treat ear infections?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- {Have you/Has SP} ever had a tube placed in {your/his/her} ear to drain the fluid from {your/his/her} ear or to treat ear infections? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — {Have you/Has SP} ever had a tube placed in {your/his/her} ear to drain the fluid from {your/his/her} ear or to treat ear infections? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ144Compatible with harmonization
A hearing test by a specialist is one that is done in a sound proof booth or room, or with headphones. Hearing specialists include audiologists, ear nose and throat doctors, and trained technicians or occupational nurses. When was the last time {you /SP} had {your/his/her} hearing tested by a hearing specialist?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- A hearing test by a specialist is one that is done in a sound proof booth or room, or with headphones. Hearing specialists include audiologists, ear nose and throat doctors, and trained technicians or occupational nurses. When was the last time {you /SP} had {your/his/her} hearing tested by a hearing specialist? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — A hearing test by a specialist is one that is done in a sound proof booth or room, or with headphones. Hearing specialists include audiologists, ear nose and throat doctors, and trained technicians or occupational nurses. When was the last time {you /SP} had {your/his/her} hearing tested by a hearing specialist? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ147Compatible with harmonization
{Do you/Does SP} now wear or use a hearing aid, a personal sound amplifier, or cochlear implant?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- {Do you/Does SP} now wear or use a hearing aid, a personal sound amplifier, or cochlear implant? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — {Do you/Does SP} now wear or use a hearing aid, a personal sound amplifier, or cochlear implant? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ149aCompatible with harmonization
Which was it?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Which was it? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Which was it? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ149bCompatible with harmonization
Which was it?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Which was it? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Which was it? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ149cCompatible with harmonization
Which was it?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Which was it? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Which was it? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ153Compatible with harmonization
In the past 2 weeks, how often {have you/has SP} worn a {hearing aid and/or personal sound amplifier and/or cochlear implant}? If unsure, provide your best estimate of the average amount of time {you have/he has/she has} worn {your/his/her} {hearing aid, and/or personal sound amplifier, and/or cochlear implant}.
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- In the past 2 weeks, how often {have you/has SP} worn a {hearing aid and/or personal sound amplifier and/or cochlear implant}? If unsure, provide your best estimate of the average amount of time {you have/he has/she has} worn {your/his/her} {hearing aid, and/or personal sound amplifier, and/or cochlear implant}. — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — In the past 2 weeks, how often {have you/has SP} worn a {hearing aid and/or personal sound amplifier and/or cochlear implant}? If unsure, provide your best estimate of the average amount of time {you have/he has/she has} worn {your/his/her} {hearing aid, and/or personal sound amplifier, and/or cochlear implant}. — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ156Compatible with harmonization
Because of hearing loss, {have you/has SP} ever used any of the following to improve {your/his/her} communication: FM systems, closed-captioned television, instant or text messages, live video streaming, amplified telephone, relay services, or a sign-language interpreter?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Because of hearing loss, {have you/has SP} ever used any of the following to improve {your/his/her} communication: FM systems, closed-captioned television, instant or text messages, live video streaming, amplified telephone, relay services, or a sign-language interpreter? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Because of hearing loss, {have you/has SP} ever used any of the following to improve {your/his/her} communication: FM systems, closed-captioned television, instant or text messages, live video streaming, amplified telephone, relay services, or a sign-language interpreter? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ191Compatible with harmonization
In the past 12 months, {have you/has SP} been bothered by ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head that lasts for 5 minutes or more?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- In the past 12 months, {have you/has SP} been bothered by ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head that lasts for 5 minutes or more? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — In the past 12 months, {have you/has SP} been bothered by ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head that lasts for 5 minutes or more? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ250Compatible with harmonization
How long {have you/has SP} been bothered by this ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How long {have you/has SP} been bothered by this ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — How long {have you/has SP} been bothered by this ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ255Compatible with harmonization
In the past 12 months, how often {have you/has SP} had this ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head? Would you say...
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- In the past 12 months, how often {have you/has SP} had this ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head? Would you say... — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — In the past 12 months, how often {have you/has SP} had this ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head? Would you say... — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ260Compatible with harmonization
{Are you/Is SP} bothered by ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head only after listening to loud sounds or loud music?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- {Are you/Is SP} bothered by ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head only after listening to loud sounds or loud music? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — {Are you/Is SP} bothered by ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head only after listening to loud sounds or loud music? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ270Compatible with harmonization
{Are you/Is SP} bothered by ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head when going to sleep?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- {Are you/Is SP} bothered by ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head when going to sleep? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — {Are you/Is SP} bothered by ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head when going to sleep? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ280Compatible with harmonization
How much of a problem is this ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head? Would you say...
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How much of a problem is this ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head? Would you say... — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — How much of a problem is this ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head? Would you say... — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ300Compatible with harmonization
This next question is about {your/SP's} use of firearms that {you/he/she} may have used for target shooting, hunting, for {your/his/her} job or in military service. {Have you/Has SP} ever used firearms for any reason?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- This next question is about {your/SP's} use of firearms that {you/he/she} may have used for target shooting, hunting, for {your/his/her} job or in military service. {Have you/Has SP} ever used firearms for any reason? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — This next question is about {your/SP's} use of firearms that {you/he/she} may have used for target shooting, hunting, for {your/his/her} job or in military service. {Have you/Has SP} ever used firearms for any reason? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ310Compatible with harmonization
How many total rounds {have you/has SP} ever fired?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How many total rounds {have you/has SP} ever fired? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — How many total rounds {have you/has SP} ever fired? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ320Compatible with harmonization
How often {did you/did SP} wear hearing protection devices (ear plugs, ear muffs) when shooting firearms?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How often {did you/did SP} wear hearing protection devices (ear plugs, ear muffs) when shooting firearms? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — How often {did you/did SP} wear hearing protection devices (ear plugs, ear muffs) when shooting firearms? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ330Compatible with harmonization
These next questions are about noise exposure {you/SP} may have had at work. {Have you/Has SP} ever had a job, or combination of jobs where {you were/s/he was} exposed to loud sounds or noise for 4 or more hours a day, several days a week? (Loud means so loud that {you/s/he} must speak in a raised voice to be heard.)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- These next questions are about noise exposure {you/SP} may have had at work. {Have you/Has SP} ever had a job, or combination of jobs where {you were/s/he was} exposed to loud sounds or noise for 4 or more hours a day, several days a week? (Loud means so loud that {you/s/he} must speak in a raised voice to be heard.) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — These next questions are about noise exposure {you/SP} may have had at work. {Have you/Has SP} ever had a job, or combination of jobs where {you were/s/he was} exposed to loud sounds or noise for 4 or more hours a day, several days a week? (Loud means so loud that {you/s/he} must speak in a raised voice to be heard.) — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ340Compatible with harmonization
For how many months or years {have you/has SP} been exposed at work to loud sounds or noise for 4 or more hours a day, several days a week?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- For how many months or years {have you/has SP} been exposed at work to loud sounds or noise for 4 or more hours a day, several days a week? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — For how many months or years {have you/has SP} been exposed at work to loud sounds or noise for 4 or more hours a day, several days a week? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ350Compatible with harmonization
In {your/SP's} work {were you/was he/was she} exposed to very loud noise? (Very loud noise is noise that is so loud {you have/he has/she has} to shout in order to be understood by someone standing 3 feet away from {you/him/her}.)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- In {your/SP's} work {were you/was he/was she} exposed to very loud noise? (Very loud noise is noise that is so loud {you have/he has/she has} to shout in order to be understood by someone standing 3 feet away from {you/him/her}.) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — In {your/SP's} work {were you/was he/was she} exposed to very loud noise? (Very loud noise is noise that is so loud {you have/he has/she has} to shout in order to be understood by someone standing 3 feet away from {you/him/her}.) — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ360Compatible with harmonization
This next question is about {your/SP's} work in jobs where there was very loud noise for 4 or more hours a day, several days a week. Please give me the total number of months or years for all jobs where this has happened.
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- This next question is about {your/SP's} work in jobs where there was very loud noise for 4 or more hours a day, several days a week. Please give me the total number of months or years for all jobs where this has happened. — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — This next question is about {your/SP's} work in jobs where there was very loud noise for 4 or more hours a day, several days a week. Please give me the total number of months or years for all jobs where this has happened. — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ370Compatible with harmonization
Outside of a job, {have you/has SP} ever been exposed to very loud noise or music for 10 or more hours a week? This is noise so loud that {you have/s/he has} to shout to be understood or heard 3 feet away. Examples are noise from power tools, lawn mowers, farm machinery, cars, trucks, motorcycles, motor boats or loud music.
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Outside of a job, {have you/has SP} ever been exposed to very loud noise or music for 10 or more hours a week? This is noise so loud that {you have/s/he has} to shout to be understood or heard 3 feet away. Examples are noise from power tools, lawn mowers, farm machinery, cars, trucks, motorcycles, motor boats or loud music. — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Outside of a job, {have you/has SP} ever been exposed to very loud noise or music for 10 or more hours a week? This is noise so loud that {you have/s/he has} to shout to be understood or heard 3 feet away. Examples are noise from power tools, lawn mowers, farm machinery, cars, trucks, motorcycles, motor boats or loud music. — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ380Compatible with harmonization
In the past 12 months, how often did {you/SP} wear hearing protection devices (ear plugs, ear muffs) when exposed to very loud sounds or noise?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2011-2012 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- In the past 12 months, how often did {you/SP} wear hearing protection devices (ear plugs, ear muffs) when exposed to very loud sounds or noise? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — In the past 12 months, how often did {you/SP} wear hearing protection devices (ear plugs, ear muffs) when exposed to very loud sounds or noise? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ400Compatible with harmonization
How old {were you/was SP} when {you/he/she} began to have any hearing loss?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How old {were you/was SP} when {you/he/she} began to have any hearing loss? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — How old {were you/was SP} when {you/he/she} began to have any hearing loss? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ410aCompatible with harmonization
What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ410bCompatible with harmonization
What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ410cCompatible with harmonization
What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ410dCompatible with harmonization
What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ410eCompatible with harmonization
What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ410fCompatible with harmonization
What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ410gCompatible with harmonization
What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ410hCompatible with harmonization
What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ410iCompatible with harmonization
What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ410jCompatible with harmonization
What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020 · 2017-2020 → 2021-2023
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — What are the main causes of {your/SP's} hearing loss? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ420Compatible with harmonization
{Have you/Has SP} ever had ear infections or earaches?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- {Have you/Has SP} ever had ear infections or earaches? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — {Have you/Has SP} ever had ear infections or earaches? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ430Compatible with harmonization
{Have you/Has SP} ever had 3 or more ear infections or earaches?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- {Have you/Has SP} ever had 3 or more ear infections or earaches? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — {Have you/Has SP} ever had 3 or more ear infections or earaches? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ440Compatible with harmonization
Has SP ever received Special Education or Early Intervention Services for speech-language, reading, hearing or listening skills, intellectual disability, movement or mobility difficulties (e.g., using arms or legs), or other developmental or disability problems?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Has SP ever received Special Education or Early Intervention Services for speech-language, reading, hearing or listening skills, intellectual disability, movement or mobility difficulties (e.g., using arms or legs), or other developmental or disability problems? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Has SP ever received Special Education or Early Intervention Services for speech-language, reading, hearing or listening skills, intellectual disability, movement or mobility difficulties (e.g., using arms or legs), or other developmental or disability problems? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ450aCompatible with harmonization
Which was it?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Which was it? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Which was it? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ450bCompatible with harmonization
Which was it?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Which was it? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Which was it? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ450cCompatible with harmonization
Which was it?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Which was it? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Which was it? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ450dCompatible with harmonization
Which was it?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Which was it? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Which was it? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ450eCompatible with harmonization
Which was it?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Which was it? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Which was it? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ450fCompatible with harmonization
Which was it?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Which was it? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Which was it? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ460Compatible with harmonization
Has SP ever been exposed to very loud noise or music for 10 or more hours a week for a period of 3 months or longer? This is noise so loud {he/she has} to shout to be understood or heard 3 feet away.
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Has SP ever been exposed to very loud noise or music for 10 or more hours a week for a period of 3 months or longer? This is noise so loud {he/she has} to shout to be understood or heard 3 feet away. — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — Has SP ever been exposed to very loud noise or music for 10 or more hours a week for a period of 3 months or longer? This is noise so loud {he/she has} to shout to be understood or heard 3 feet away. — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ470Compatible with harmonization
How long has SP been exposed to very loud noise or music for 10 or more hours a week? This is noise so loud that {he/she has} to shout to be understood or heard 3 feet away.
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How long has SP been exposed to very loud noise or music for 10 or more hours a week? This is noise so loud that {he/she has} to shout to be understood or heard 3 feet away. — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — How long has SP been exposed to very loud noise or music for 10 or more hours a week? This is noise so loud that {he/she has} to shout to be understood or heard 3 feet away. — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ480Compatible with harmonization
How often does {your/SP's} hearing cause {you/him/her} to avoid groups of people, limiting or hampering {your/his/her} personal or social life? Would you say...
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How often does {your/SP's} hearing cause {you/him/her} to avoid groups of people, limiting or hampering {your/his/her} personal or social life? Would you say... — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — How often does {your/SP's} hearing cause {you/him/her} to avoid groups of people, limiting or hampering {your/his/her} personal or social life? Would you say... — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ490Compatible with harmonization
During the past 12 months, {have you/has SP} had a problem with dizziness, lightheadedness, feeling as if {you are/s/he is} going to pass out or faint, unsteadiness or imbalance?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- During the past 12 months, {have you/has SP} had a problem with dizziness, lightheadedness, feeling as if {you are/s/he is} going to pass out or faint, unsteadiness or imbalance? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — During the past 12 months, {have you/has SP} had a problem with dizziness, lightheadedness, feeling as if {you are/s/he is} going to pass out or faint, unsteadiness or imbalance? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ500Compatible with harmonization
{Have you/Has SP} ever discussed this ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head with {your/his/her} doctor or other health care professional?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- {Have you/Has SP} ever discussed this ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head with {your/his/her} doctor or other health care professional? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — {Have you/Has SP} ever discussed this ringing, roaring, or buzzing in {your/his/her} ears or head with {your/his/her} doctor or other health care professional? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ510Compatible with harmonization
How long {have you/has SP} been exposed to very loud noise or music for 10 or more hours a week? This is noise so loud that {you have/s/he has} to shout to be understood or heard 3 feet away.
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How long {have you/has SP} been exposed to very loud noise or music for 10 or more hours a week? This is noise so loud that {you have/s/he has} to shout to be understood or heard 3 feet away. — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — How long {have you/has SP} been exposed to very loud noise or music for 10 or more hours a week? This is noise so loud that {you have/s/he has} to shout to be understood or heard 3 feet away. — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUQ520Compatible with harmonization
In the past 24 hours, have you listened to music with earphones?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- In the past 24 hours, have you listened to music with earphones? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — In the past 24 hours, have you listened to music with earphones? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ530Compatible with harmonization
How many hours ago did you stop listening?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- How many hours ago did you stop listening? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — How many hours ago did you stop listening? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ540Compatible with harmonization
Do you have a cold, runny nose, or earache today?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Do you have a cold, runny nose, or earache today? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Do you have a cold, runny nose, or earache today? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ550Compatible with harmonization
Did you have a cold, runny nose, or earache yesterday?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Did you have a cold, runny nose, or earache yesterday? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Did you have a cold, runny nose, or earache yesterday? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ550ACompatible with harmonization
Have you had a cold today or yesterday?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you had a cold today or yesterday? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you had a cold today or yesterday? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ550BCompatible with harmonization
Have you had runny nose today or yesterday?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you had runny nose today or yesterday? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you had runny nose today or yesterday? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ550CCompatible with harmonization
Have you had an earache in right ear today or yesterday?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you had an earache in right ear today or yesterday? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you had an earache in right ear today or yesterday? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ550DCompatible with harmonization
Have you had an earache in left ear today or yesterday?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you had an earache in left ear today or yesterday? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you had an earache in left ear today or yesterday? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ550ECompatible with harmonization
Have you had an earache in both ears today or yesterday?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you had an earache in both ears today or yesterday? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you had an earache in both ears today or yesterday? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ560Compatible with harmonization
Have you listened to sounds today that were so loud you would have to shout so someone close by could hear you?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you listened to sounds today that were so loud you would have to shout so someone close by could hear you? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you listened to sounds today that were so loud you would have to shout so someone close by could hear you? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ570Compatible with harmonization
Did you listen to any sounds that were that loud yesterday?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Did you listen to any sounds that were that loud yesterday? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Did you listen to any sounds that were that loud yesterday? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ580Compatible with harmonization
When was that?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- When was that? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — When was that? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ590Compatible with harmonization
Have you listened to music with earphones today?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Have you listened to music with earphones today? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Have you listened to music with earphones today? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ600Compatible with harmonization
Did you listen to music with earphones yesterday?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- Did you listen to music with earphones yesterday? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Did you listen to music with earphones yesterday? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ610Compatible with harmonization
When was that?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- When was that? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — When was that? — Audiometry (Examination)
AUQ630Compatible with harmonization
{Have you/Has SP} ever worn or used a hearing aid, a personal sound amplifier, or cochlear implant in the past?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Variable names / labels over time
- {Have you/Has SP} ever worn or used a hearing aid, a personal sound amplifier, or cochlear implant in the past? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUQ — {Have you/Has SP} ever worn or used a hearing aid, a personal sound amplifier, or cochlear implant in the past? — Audiometry (Questionnaire)
AUXLOABNCompatible with harmonization
Other Exam Abnormality, Left Ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Other Exam Abnormality, Left Ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Other Exam Abnormality, Left Ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXLOCOLCompatible with harmonization
Collapsing Ear Canal, Left Ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Collapsing Ear Canal, Left Ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Collapsing Ear Canal, Left Ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXLOEXCCompatible with harmonization
Excessive Cerumen, Left Ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Excessive Cerumen, Left Ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Excessive Cerumen, Left Ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXLOIMCCompatible with harmonization
Impacted Cerumen, Left Ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Impacted Cerumen, Left Ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Impacted Cerumen, Left Ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXOTSPLCompatible with harmonization
Normal: Left Ear Otoscopy
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Normal: Left Ear Otoscopy — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Normal: Left Ear Otoscopy — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR1K1LCompatible with harmonization
Left retest threshold @ 1000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left retest threshold @ 1000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left retest threshold @ 1000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR1K1RCompatible with harmonization
Right retest threshold @ 1000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right retest threshold @ 1000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right retest threshold @ 1000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR1K2LCompatible with harmonization
Left retest threshold @ 1000Hz, (second reading) in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left retest threshold @ 1000Hz, (second reading) in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left retest threshold @ 1000Hz, (second reading) in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR1K2RCompatible with harmonization
Right retest threshold @ 1000Hz, (second reading) in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right retest threshold @ 1000Hz, (second reading) in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right retest threshold @ 1000Hz, (second reading) in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR2KLCompatible with harmonization
Left retest threshold @ 2000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left retest threshold @ 2000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left retest threshold @ 2000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR2KRCompatible with harmonization
Right retest threshold @ 2000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right retest threshold @ 2000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right retest threshold @ 2000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR3KLCompatible with harmonization
Left retest threshold @ 3000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left retest threshold @ 3000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left retest threshold @ 3000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR3KRCompatible with harmonization
Right retest threshold @ 3000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right retest threshold @ 3000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right retest threshold @ 3000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR4KLCompatible with harmonization
Left retest threshold @ 4000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left retest threshold @ 4000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left retest threshold @ 4000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR4KRCompatible with harmonization
Right retest threshold @ 4000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right retest threshold @ 4000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right retest threshold @ 4000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR5CLCompatible with harmonization
Left retest threshold @ 500Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left retest threshold @ 500Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left retest threshold @ 500Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR5CRCompatible with harmonization
Right retest threshold @ 500Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right retest threshold @ 500Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right retest threshold @ 500Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR6KLCompatible with harmonization
Left retest threshold @ 6000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left retest threshold @ 6000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left retest threshold @ 6000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR6KRCompatible with harmonization
Right retest threshold @ 6000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right retest threshold @ 6000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right retest threshold @ 6000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR8KLCompatible with harmonization
Left retest threshold @ 8000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left retest threshold @ 8000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left retest threshold @ 8000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXR8KRCompatible with harmonization
Right retest threshold @ 8000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right retest threshold @ 8000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right retest threshold @ 8000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXROABNCompatible with harmonization
Other Exam Abnormality, Right Ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Other Exam Abnormality, Right Ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Other Exam Abnormality, Right Ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXROCOLCompatible with harmonization
Collapsing Ear Canal, Right Ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Collapsing Ear Canal, Right Ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Collapsing Ear Canal, Right Ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXROEXCCompatible with harmonization
Excessive Cerumen, Right Ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Excessive Cerumen, Right Ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Excessive Cerumen, Right Ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXROIMCCompatible with harmonization
Impacted Cerumen, Right Ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Impacted Cerumen, Right Ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Impacted Cerumen, Right Ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXROTSPCompatible with harmonization
Normal: Right Ear Otoscopy
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Normal: Right Ear Otoscopy — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Normal: Right Ear Otoscopy — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXTCOMLCompatible with harmonization
Compliance (tympanometry), left ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Compliance (tympanometry), left ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Compliance (tympanometry), left ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXTCOMRCompatible with harmonization
Compliance (tympanometry), right ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Compliance (tympanometry), right ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Compliance (tympanometry), right ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXTMEPLCompatible with harmonization
Middle ear pressure (tympanometry), left ear, in daPa (dekaPascals)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Middle ear pressure (tympanometry), left ear, in daPa (dekaPascals) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Middle ear pressure (tympanometry), left ear, in daPa (dekaPascals) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXTMEPRCompatible with harmonization
Middle ear pressure (tympanometry), right ear, in daPa (dekaPascals)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Middle ear pressure (tympanometry), right ear, in daPa (dekaPascals) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Middle ear pressure (tympanometry), right ear, in daPa (dekaPascals) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXTPVLCompatible with harmonization
Physical volume (tympanometry), left ear, in cc
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Physical volume (tympanometry), left ear, in cc — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Physical volume (tympanometry), left ear, in cc — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXTPVRCompatible with harmonization
Physical volume (tympanometry), right ear, in cc
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Physical volume (tympanometry), right ear, in cc — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Physical volume (tympanometry), right ear, in cc — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXTWIDLCompatible with harmonization
Tympanometric width, left ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Tympanometric width, left ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Tympanometric width, left ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXTWIDRCompatible with harmonization
Tympanometric width, right ear
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Tympanometric width, right ear — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Tympanometric width, right ear — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU1K1LCompatible with harmonization
Left threshold @ 1000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left threshold @ 1000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left threshold @ 1000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU1K1RCompatible with harmonization
Right threshold @ 1000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right threshold @ 1000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right threshold @ 1000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU1K2LCompatible with harmonization
Left threshold @ 1000Hz (second reading) in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left threshold @ 1000Hz (second reading) in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left threshold @ 1000Hz (second reading) in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU1K2RCompatible with harmonization
Right threshold @ 1000Hz (second reading) in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right threshold @ 1000Hz (second reading) in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right threshold @ 1000Hz (second reading) in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU2KLCompatible with harmonization
Left threshold @ 2000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left threshold @ 2000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left threshold @ 2000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU2KRCompatible with harmonization
Right threshold @ 2000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right threshold @ 2000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right threshold @ 2000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU3KLCompatible with harmonization
Left threshold @ 3000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left threshold @ 3000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left threshold @ 3000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU3KRCompatible with harmonization
Right threshold @ 3000Hz in decibels (Hearing Levels)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right threshold @ 3000Hz in decibels (Hearing Levels) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right threshold @ 3000Hz in decibels (Hearing Levels) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU4KLCompatible with harmonization
Left threshold @ 4000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left threshold @ 4000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left threshold @ 4000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU4KRCompatible with harmonization
Right threshold @ 4000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right threshold @ 4000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right threshold @ 4000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU500LCompatible with harmonization
Left threshold @ 500Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left threshold @ 500Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left threshold @ 500Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU500RCompatible with harmonization
Right threshold @ 500Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right threshold @ 500Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right threshold @ 500Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU6KLCompatible with harmonization
Left threshold @ 6000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left threshold @ 6000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left threshold @ 6000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU6KRCompatible with harmonization
Right threshold @ 6000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified Praxis harmonization assessment
Compatible with harmonization · moderate confidence
No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.
Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence
Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2015-2016 · 2015-2016 → 2017-2018 · 2017-2018 → 2017-2020
Praxis harmonization actions
- Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
- Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
- Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
- Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right threshold @ 6000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right threshold @ 6000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU8KLIndexed code and label stable
Left threshold @ 8000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Left threshold @ 8000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Left threshold @ 8000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
AUXU8KRIndexed code and label stable
Right threshold @ 8000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Right threshold @ 8000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_AUX — Right threshold @ 8000Hz in decibels (Hearing Level) — Audiometry (Examination)
BMDBMICIndexed code and label stable
BMI Category - Children/Youth
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- BMI Category - Children/Youth — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — BMI Category - Children/Youth — Body Measures (Examination)
BMDSTATSIndexed code and label stable
Body Measures Component status Code
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Body Measures Component status Code — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Body Measures Component status Code — Body Measures (Examination)
BMIARMCIndexed code and label stable
Arm Circumference Comment
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Arm Circumference Comment — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Arm Circumference Comment — Body Measures (Examination)
BMIARMLIndexed code and label stable
Upper Arm Length Comment
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Upper Arm Length Comment — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Upper Arm Length Comment — Body Measures (Examination)
BMIHEADIndexed code and label stable
Head Circumference Comment
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Head Circumference Comment — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Head Circumference Comment — Body Measures (Examination)
BMIHIPIndexed code and label stable
Hip Circumference Comment
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Hip Circumference Comment — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Hip Circumference Comment — Body Measures (Examination)
BMIHTIndexed code and label stable
Standing Height Comment
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Standing Height Comment — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Standing Height Comment — Body Measures (Examination)
BMILEGIndexed code and label stable
Upper Leg Length Comment
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Upper Leg Length Comment — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Upper Leg Length Comment — Body Measures (Examination)
BMIRECUMIndexed code and label stable
Recumbent Length Comment
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Recumbent Length Comment — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Recumbent Length Comment — Body Measures (Examination)
BMIWAISTIndexed code and label stable
Waist Circumference Comment
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Waist Circumference Comment — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Waist Circumference Comment — Body Measures (Examination)
BMIWTIndexed code and label stable
Weight Comment
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Weight Comment — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Weight Comment — Body Measures (Examination)
BMXARMCIndexed code and label stable
Arm Circumference (cm)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Arm Circumference (cm) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Arm Circumference (cm) — Body Measures (Examination)
BMXARMLIndexed code and label stable
Upper Arm Length (cm)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Upper Arm Length (cm) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Upper Arm Length (cm) — Body Measures (Examination)
BMXBMIPraxis evidence enriched
Body Mass Index (kg/m**2)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Supporting source-evidence notes
Method documentation varies across releases. Praxis flags the affected boundaries for review without automatically calling them scientific method changes.
These notes summarize indexed evidence and method-text signals. They do not supersede the qualified harmonization assessment above.
- Documented weight variables
- No explicit weight captured
- Units observed
- Not stated / categorical
- Enriched releases
- 12
- Method-change status
- documentation varies
Method-change assessment
Method documentation varies across cycles
Method documentation or comparability language varies across releases, but Praxis has not confirmed a substantive method change from the captured text alone. Review the flagged boundaries before pooling.
- Releases with method evidence
- 12
- Flagged method boundaries
- 11
- Assessment status
- Method documentation varies across cycles
- Inference rule
- Documentation differences ≠ confirmed method changes
Method / instrument change points and harmonization actions
- 1999-2000 → 2001-2002: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source - 2001-2002 → 2003-2004: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source - 2003-2004 → 2005-2006: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source - 2005-2006 → 2007-2008: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source - 2007-2008 → 2009-2010: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source - 2009-2010 → 2011-2012: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source - 2011-2012 → 2013-2014: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source - 2013-2014 → 2015-2016: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source - 2015-2016 → 2017-2018: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source - 2017-2018 → 2017-2020: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source - 2017-2020 → 2021-2023: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source
Cycle-by-cycle method chronology
- 1999-2000: BMX — Data Collection Methods The data collection methods, examination protocol, and data collection forms are fully documented in the Anthropometry Procedures Manual. Examination Protocol See Item 3 above. In addition, for general guidelines on standard procedures that were followed for the anthropometric measures, refer to the Anthropometric Standardization Reference manual (Lohman, 1988). For specific guidelines, the Anthropometric Procedures Video that demonstrates the NHANES III anthropometric p…
- 2001-2002: BMX_B — The data collection methods, examination protocol, and data collection forms are fully documented in the NHANES Anthropometry Procedures Manual. In addition, for general guidelines on standard procedures that were followed for the anthropometric measures, please refer to the Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual (Lohman, 1988). The actual measurement techniques used in the survey are illustrated in the NHANES III Anthropometric Procedures Video. The video demonstrates the NHANES III a…
- 2003-2004: BMX_C — The body measurement assessments performed on survey participants varied according to the age of the survey participant. The body measurement protocol used age at the time of the screening interview. In some instances, several weeks elapsed between the initial screening interview and the health examination visit. The Demographics Data File includes an age variable for age at examination (RIDAGEEX). Arm and leg measurements were made on the right side of the body. If an examinee had an amputatio…
- 2005-2006: BMX_D — The body measurement data were collected by trained health technicians. The health technician was accompanied by a recorder during each body measurement examination. The respondent’s age, at the time of the screening interview, determined the body measurement examination protocol for survey participants. In some instances, several weeks elapsed between the initial screening interview and the health examination. The Demographics data file includes variables for age at screening (RIDAGEYR and RID…
- 2007-2008: BMX_E — The body measurement data were collected by trained health technicians. The health technician was assisted by a recorder during the body measurement examination. The respondent’s age at the time of the screening interview determined the body measurement examination protocol for survey participants. In some instances the age at screening interview and age at the time of the health examination differed by several weeks. The Demographics data file includes variables for age at screening (RIDAGEYR …
- 2009-2010: BMX_F — The body measurement data were collected, in the Mobile Examination Center (MEC), by trained health technicians. The health technician was assisted by a recorder during the body measurement examination. The respondent’s age at the time of the screening interview determined the body measurement examination protocol for survey participants. In some instances the age at screening interview and age at the time of the health examination differed by several weeks. The Demographics data file includes …
- 2011-2012: BMX_G — The body measures data were collected, in the Mobile Examination Center (MEC), by trained health technicians. The health technician was assisted by a recorder during the body measures examination. The participant’s age at the time of the screening interview determined the body measures examination protocol. In some instances, the age at the screening interview and age at the time of the health examination differed by several weeks. The Demographics data file includes variables for age in years …
- 2013-2014: BMX_H — The body measures data were collected, in the Mobile Examination Center (MEC), by trained health technicians. The health technician was assisted by a recorder during the body measures examination. The participant’s age at the time of the screening interview determined the body measures examination protocol. In some instances, the age at the screening interview and age at the time of the health examination differed by several weeks. The Demographics data file includes variables for age in years …
- 2015-2016: BMX_I — The body measures data were collected, in the Mobile Examination Center (MEC), by trained health technicians. The health technician was assisted by a recorder during the body measures examination. The participant’s age at the time of the screening interview determined the body measures examination protocol. In some instances, the age at the screening interview and age at the time of the health examination differed by several weeks. The Demographics data file includes variables for age in years …
- 2017-2018: BMX_J — The body measures data were collected, in the Mobile Examination Center (MEC), by trained health technicians. The health technician was assisted by a recorder during the body measures examination. The participant’s age at the time of the screening interview determined the body measures examination protocol. In some instances, the age at the screening interview and age at the time of the health examination differed by several weeks. The Demographics data file includes variables for age in years …
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — The body measures data were collected, in the Mobile Examination Center (MEC), by trained health technicians. The health technician was assisted by a recorder during the body measures examination. The participant’s age at the time of the screening interview determined the body measures examination protocol. In some instances, the age at the screening interview and age at the time of the health examination differed by several weeks. The Demographics data file includes variables age in years at s…
- 2021-2023: BMX_L — The body measures data were collected, in the Mobile Examination Center (MEC), by trained health technicians. The health technician was assisted by a recorder during the body measures examination. The participant’s age at the time of the screening interview determined the body measures examination protocol. In some instances, the age at the screening interview and age at the time of the health examination differed by several weeks. The Demographics data file includes variables age in years at s…
Praxis-enriched cycle evidence
- 1999-2000: BMX · Target: Both males and females 2 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2001-2002: BMX_B · Target: Both males and females 2 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2003-2004: BMX_C · Target: Both males and females 2 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2005-2006: BMX_D · Target: Both males and females 2 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2007-2008: BMX_E · Target: Both males and females 2 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2009-2010: BMX_F · Target: Both males and females 2 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2011-2012: BMX_G · Target: Both males and females 2 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2013-2014: BMX_H · Target: Both males and females 2 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2015-2016: BMX_I · Target: Both males and females 2 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2017-2018: BMX_J · Target: Both males and females 2 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2017-2020: P_BMX · Target: Both males and females 2 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2021-2023: BMX_L · Target: Both males and females 2 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
Variable names / labels over time
- Body Mass Index (kg/m**2) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Body Mass Index (kg/m**2) — Body Measures (Examination)
BMXHEADIndexed code and label stable
Head Circumference (cm)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Head Circumference (cm) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Head Circumference (cm) — Body Measures (Examination)
BMXHIPIndexed code and label stable
Hip Circumference (cm)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Hip Circumference (cm) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Hip Circumference (cm) — Body Measures (Examination)
BMXHTIndexed code and label stable
Standing Height (cm)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Standing Height (cm) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Standing Height (cm) — Body Measures (Examination)
BMXLEGIndexed code and label stable
Upper Leg Length (cm)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Upper Leg Length (cm) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Upper Leg Length (cm) — Body Measures (Examination)
BMXRECUMIndexed code and label stable
Recumbent Length (cm)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Recumbent Length (cm) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Recumbent Length (cm) — Body Measures (Examination)
BMXWAISTIndexed code and label stable
Waist Circumference (cm)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Waist Circumference (cm) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Waist Circumference (cm) — Body Measures (Examination)
BMXWTIndexed code and label stable
Weight (kg)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Weight (kg) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BMX — Weight (kg) — Body Measures (Examination)
BPAOARMIndexed code and label stable
Arm selected - oscillometric
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Arm selected - oscillometric — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO — Arm selected - oscillometric — Blood Pressure - Oscillometric Measurement (Examination)
BPAOCSZIndexed code and label stable
Mid arm circumference (cm) cuffing parameters - oscillometric
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Mid arm circumference (cm) cuffing parameters - oscillometric — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO — Mid arm circumference (cm) cuffing parameters - oscillometric — Blood Pressure - Oscillometric Measurement (Examination)
BPD035Indexed code and label stable
How old {were you/was SP} when {you were/he/she was} first told that {you/he/she} had hypertension or high blood pressure?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- How old {were you/was SP} when {you were/he/she was} first told that {you/he/she} had hypertension or high blood pressure? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPQ — How old {were you/was SP} when {you were/he/she was} first told that {you/he/she} had hypertension or high blood pressure? — Blood Pressure & Cholesterol (Questionnaire)
BPQ020Indexed code and label stable
{Have you/Has SP} ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that {you/s/he} had hypertension, also called high blood pressure?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Have you/Has SP} ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that {you/s/he} had hypertension, also called high blood pressure? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPQ — {Have you/Has SP} ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that {you/s/he} had hypertension, also called high blood pressure? — Blood Pressure & Cholesterol (Questionnaire)
BPQ030Indexed code and label stable
{Were you/Was SP} told on 2 or more different visits that {you/s/he} had hypertension, also called high blood pressure?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Were you/Was SP} told on 2 or more different visits that {you/s/he} had hypertension, also called high blood pressure? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPQ — {Were you/Was SP} told on 2 or more different visits that {you/s/he} had hypertension, also called high blood pressure? — Blood Pressure & Cholesterol (Questionnaire)
BPQ040AIndexed code and label stable
Because of {your/SP's} (high blood pressure/hypertension), {have you/has s/he} ever been told to . . . take prescribed medicine?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Because of {your/SP's} (high blood pressure/hypertension), {have you/has s/he} ever been told to . . . take prescribed medicine? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPQ — Because of {your/SP's} (high blood pressure/hypertension), {have you/has s/he} ever been told to . . . take prescribed medicine? — Blood Pressure & Cholesterol (Questionnaire)
BPQ050AIndexed code and label stable
{Are you/Is SP} now taking prescribed medicine?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Are you/Is SP} now taking prescribed medicine? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPQ — {Are you/Is SP} now taking prescribed medicine? — Blood Pressure & Cholesterol (Questionnaire)
BPQ060Indexed code and label stable
{Have you/Has SP} ever had {your/his/her} blood cholesterol checked?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Have you/Has SP} ever had {your/his/her} blood cholesterol checked? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPQ — {Have you/Has SP} ever had {your/his/her} blood cholesterol checked? — Blood Pressure & Cholesterol (Questionnaire)
BPQ070Indexed code and label stable
About how long has it been since {you/SP} last had {your/his/her} blood cholesterol checked? Has it been...
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- About how long has it been since {you/SP} last had {your/his/her} blood cholesterol checked? Has it been... — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPQ — About how long has it been since {you/SP} last had {your/his/her} blood cholesterol checked? Has it been... — Blood Pressure & Cholesterol (Questionnaire)
BPQ080Indexed code and label stable
{Have you/Has SP} ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that {your/his/her} blood cholesterol level was high?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Have you/Has SP} ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that {your/his/her} blood cholesterol level was high? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPQ — {Have you/Has SP} ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that {your/his/her} blood cholesterol level was high? — Blood Pressure & Cholesterol (Questionnaire)
BPQ090DIndexed code and label stable
[To lower (your/his/her) blood cholesterol, (have/has) (you/SP) ever been told by a doctor or other health professional]... to take prescribed medicine?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- [To lower (your/his/her) blood cholesterol, (have/has) (you/SP) ever been told by a doctor or other health professional]... to take prescribed medicine? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPQ — [To lower (your/his/her) blood cholesterol, (have/has) (you/SP) ever been told by a doctor or other health professional]... to take prescribed medicine? — Blood Pressure & Cholesterol (Questionnaire)
BPQ100DIndexed code and label stable
(Are you/Is SP) now following this advice to take prescribed medicine?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- (Are you/Is SP) now following this advice to take prescribed medicine? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPQ — (Are you/Is SP) now following this advice to take prescribed medicine? — Blood Pressure & Cholesterol (Questionnaire)
BPXODI1Indexed code and label stable
Diastolic - 1st oscillometric reading
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Diastolic - 1st oscillometric reading — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO — Diastolic - 1st oscillometric reading — Blood Pressure - Oscillometric Measurement (Examination)
BPXODI2Indexed code and label stable
Diastolic - 2nd oscillometric reading
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Diastolic - 2nd oscillometric reading — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO — Diastolic - 2nd oscillometric reading — Blood Pressure - Oscillometric Measurement (Examination)
BPXODI3Indexed code and label stable
Diastolic - 3rd oscillometric reading
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Diastolic - 3rd oscillometric reading — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO — Diastolic - 3rd oscillometric reading — Blood Pressure - Oscillometric Measurement (Examination)
BPXOPLS1Indexed code and label stable
Pulse - 1st oscillometric reading
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Pulse - 1st oscillometric reading — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO — Pulse - 1st oscillometric reading — Blood Pressure - Oscillometric Measurement (Examination)
BPXOPLS2Indexed code and label stable
Pulse - 2nd oscillometric reading
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Pulse - 2nd oscillometric reading — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO — Pulse - 2nd oscillometric reading — Blood Pressure - Oscillometric Measurement (Examination)
BPXOPLS3Indexed code and label stable
Pulse - 3rd oscillometric reading
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Pulse - 3rd oscillometric reading — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO — Pulse - 3rd oscillometric reading — Blood Pressure - Oscillometric Measurement (Examination)
BPXOSY1Praxis evidence enriched
Systolic - 1st oscillometric reading
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Supporting source-evidence notes
Method documentation varies across releases. Praxis flags the affected boundaries for review without automatically calling them scientific method changes.
These notes summarize indexed evidence and method-text signals. They do not supersede the qualified harmonization assessment above.
- Documented weight variables
- No explicit weight captured
- Units observed
- Not stated / categorical
- Enriched releases
- 3
- Method-change status
- documentation varies
Method-change assessment
Method documentation varies across cycles
Method documentation or comparability language varies across releases, but Praxis has not confirmed a substantive method change from the captured text alone. Review the flagged boundaries before pooling.
- Releases with method evidence
- 3
- Flagged method boundaries
- 2
- Assessment status
- Method documentation varies across cycles
- Inference rule
- Documentation differences ≠ confirmed method changes
Method / instrument change points and harmonization actions
- 2017-2018 → 2017-2020: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source - 2017-2020 → 2021-2023: Documentation changed — method change not yet confirmed · Evidence: automated documentation comparison. The captured CDC/NCHS method documentation differs from the preceding enriched release. Praxis does not treat a text difference alone as proof that the scientific method changed.
Harmonization action: Review the linked source documents before pooling across this boundary. Until a substantive method/instrument change is confirmed, classify this as documentation variation rather than a scientific discontinuity. Review source
Cycle-by-cycle method chronology
- 2017-2018: BPXO_J — All BP measurements (systolic and diastolic) are taken in the mobile examination center (MEC). Prior to obtaining BP measurements, upper arm circumference is measured, which is done to guide selection of cuff size. Details on the protocol for obtaining upper arm circumference is described in the Anthropometry Procedures Manual. After resting quietly in a seated position for 5 minutes; three consecutive BP measurements (systolic and diastolic) were taken 60 seconds apart using a digital upper-ar…
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO — All BP measurements are taken in the mobile examination center (MEC). Prior to obtaining BP measurements, upper arm circumference is measured, which is done to guide selection of cuff size. Details on the protocol for obtaining upper arm circumference is described in the Anthropometry Procedures Manual. After resting quietly in a seated position for 5 minutes; three consecutive BP measurements were taken 60 seconds apart using a digital upper-arm electronic measurement device, Omron HEM–907XL. …
- 2021-2023: BPXO_L — All BP measurements are taken in the mobile examination center (MEC). Prior to obtaining BP measurements, upper arm circumference is measured, which is done to guide selection of cuff size. After resting quietly in a seated position for 5 minutes, three consecutive BP measurements (systolic and diastolic) were taken 60 seconds apart using a digital upper-arm electronic blood pressure measurement device, Omron HEM–907XL. This device has been previously validated by both the Association for the A…
Praxis-enriched cycle evidence
- 2017-2018: BPXO_J · Target: Both males and females 8 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO · Target: Both males and females 8 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
- 2021-2023: BPXO_L · Target: Both males and females 8 YEARS - 150 YEARS · Method evidence captured
Variable names / labels over time
- Systolic - 1st oscillometric reading — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO — Systolic - 1st oscillometric reading — Blood Pressure - Oscillometric Measurement (Examination)
BPXOSY2Indexed code and label stable
Systolic - 2nd oscillometric reading
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Systolic - 2nd oscillometric reading — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO — Systolic - 2nd oscillometric reading — Blood Pressure - Oscillometric Measurement (Examination)
BPXOSY3Indexed code and label stable
Systolic - 3rd oscillometric reading
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Examination
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Systolic - 3rd oscillometric reading — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_BPXO — Systolic - 3rd oscillometric reading — Blood Pressure - Oscillometric Measurement (Examination)
CBD071Indexed code and label stable
The next questions are about how much money {your family spends/you spend} on food. First I'll ask you about money spent at supermarkets or grocery stores. Then we will talk about money spent at other types of stores. When you answer these questions, please do not include money spent on alcoholic beverages. During the past 30 days, how much money {did your family/did you} spend at supermarkets or grocery stores? Please include purchases made with food stamps. (You can tell me per week or per month.)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- The next questions are about how much money {your family spends/you spend} on food. First I'll ask you about money spent at supermarkets or grocery stores. Then we will talk about money spent at other types of stores. When you answer these questions, please do not include money spent on alcoholic beverages. During the past 30 days, how much money {did your family/did you} spend at supermarkets or grocery stores? Please include purchases made with food stamps. (You can tell me per week or per month.) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQ_R — The next questions are about how much money {your family spends/you spend} on food. First I'll ask you about money spent at supermarkets or grocery stores. Then we will talk about money spent at other types of stores. When you answer these questions, please do not include money spent on alcoholic beverages. During the past 30 days, how much money {did your family/did you} spend at supermarkets or grocery stores? Please include purchases made with food stamps. (You can tell me per week or per month.) — Consumer Behavior (Questionnaire) — Note: RDC Only
CBD091Indexed code and label stable
About how much money was spent on nonfood items? (You can tell me per week or per month.)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- About how much money was spent on nonfood items? (You can tell me per week or per month.) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQ_R — About how much money was spent on nonfood items? (You can tell me per week or per month.) — Consumer Behavior (Questionnaire) — Note: RDC Only
CBD111Indexed code and label stable
About how much money {did your family/did you} spend on food at these types of stores? Please do not include money you have already told me about. (You can tell me per week or per month.)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- About how much money {did your family/did you} spend on food at these types of stores? Please do not include money you have already told me about. (You can tell me per week or per month.) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQ_R — About how much money {did your family/did you} spend on food at these types of stores? Please do not include money you have already told me about. (You can tell me per week or per month.) — Consumer Behavior (Questionnaire) — Note: RDC Only
CBD121Indexed code and label stable
During the past 30 days, how much money {did your family/did you} spend on eating out? Please include money spent in cafeterias at work or at school or on vending machines, for all family members. (You can tell me per week or per month.)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- During the past 30 days, how much money {did your family/did you} spend on eating out? Please include money spent in cafeterias at work or at school or on vending machines, for all family members. (You can tell me per week or per month.) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQ_R — During the past 30 days, how much money {did your family/did you} spend on eating out? Please include money spent in cafeterias at work or at school or on vending machines, for all family members. (You can tell me per week or per month.) — Consumer Behavior (Questionnaire) — Note: RDC Only
CBD131Indexed code and label stable
During the past 30 days, how much money {did your family/did you} spend on food carried out or delivered? Please do not include money you have already told me about. (You can tell me per week or per month.)
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- During the past 30 days, how much money {did your family/did you} spend on food carried out or delivered? Please do not include money you have already told me about. (You can tell me per week or per month.) — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQ_R — During the past 30 days, how much money {did your family/did you} spend on food carried out or delivered? Please do not include money you have already told me about. (You can tell me per week or per month.) — Consumer Behavior (Questionnaire) — Note: RDC Only
CBD760Indexed code and label stable
How old are you?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- How old are you? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — How old are you? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBD765Indexed code and label stable
Which of the following best describe your highest education level?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Which of the following best describe your highest education level? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — Which of the following best describe your highest education level? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBD770Indexed code and label stable
What is the gender of the respondent?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- What is the gender of the respondent? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — What is the gender of the respondent? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBD925Multiple dataset contexts
Now turn to {hand cards 22 and 23/hand cards 24 and 25}. The label of the product shows 10% Daily Value for Vitamin D in a serving of the product. What does the 10% Daily Value mean to you?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Now turn to {hand cards 22 and 23/hand cards 24 and 25}. The label of the product shows 10% Daily Value for Vitamin D in a serving of the product. What does the 10% Daily Value mean to you? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — Now turn to {hand cards 22 and 23/hand cards 24 and 25}. The label of the product shows 10% Daily Value for Vitamin D in a serving of the product. What does the 10% Daily Value mean to you? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — Now turn to {hand cards 22 and 23/hand cards 24 and 25}. The label of the product shows 10% Daily Value for Vitamin D in a serving of the product. What does the 10% Daily Value mean to you? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ502Multiple dataset contexts
Do you have the green hand card booklet? {It is in the same bag as the food measuring guides [you used for your/we used for SP’s] dietary phone interview. I'll wait while you locate it. Do you have it?}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Do you have the green hand card booklet? {It is in the same bag as the food measuring guides [you used for your/we used for SP’s] dietary phone interview. I'll wait while you locate it. Do you have it?} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — Do you have the green hand card booklet? {It is in the same bag as the food measuring guides [you used for your/we used for SP’s] dietary phone interview. I'll wait while you locate it. Do you have it?} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — Do you have the green hand card booklet? {It is in the same bag as the food measuring guides [you used for your/we used for SP’s] dietary phone interview. I'll wait while you locate it. Do you have it?} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ503Multiple dataset contexts
Let's go ahead with the interview anyway. Do you have a cereal box, can or package of food with a food label on the back or the side that you can use for this interview? I'll wait while you locate it.
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Let's go ahead with the interview anyway. Do you have a cereal box, can or package of food with a food label on the back or the side that you can use for this interview? I'll wait while you locate it. — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — Let's go ahead with the interview anyway. Do you have a cereal box, can or package of food with a food label on the back or the side that you can use for this interview? I'll wait while you locate it. — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — Let's go ahead with the interview anyway. Do you have a cereal box, can or package of food with a food label on the back or the side that you can use for this interview? I'll wait while you locate it. — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ506Multiple dataset contexts
I am going to ask you about eating foods and beverages from different places. The types of places are listed on hand card 1 in your booklet. Please turn to hand card 1. We will start with foods or beverages from fast food or pizza places, then I'll go down the list and ask you about each of the other places.} For the first few questions, please answer yes or no. In the past 12 months, did you buy food from fast food or pizza places?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- I am going to ask you about eating foods and beverages from different places. The types of places are listed on hand card 1 in your booklet. Please turn to hand card 1. We will start with foods or beverages from fast food or pizza places, then I'll go down the list and ask you about each of the other places.} For the first few questions, please answer yes or no. In the past 12 months, did you buy food from fast food or pizza places? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — I am going to ask you about eating foods and beverages from different places. The types of places are listed on hand card 1 in your booklet. Please turn to hand card 1. We will start with foods or beverages from fast food or pizza places, then I'll go down the list and ask you about each of the other places.} For the first few questions, please answer yes or no. In the past 12 months, did you buy food from fast food or pizza places? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — I am going to ask you about eating foods and beverages from different places. The types of places are listed on hand card 1 in your booklet. Please turn to hand card 1. We will start with foods or beverages from fast food or pizza places, then I'll go down the list and ask you about each of the other places.} For the first few questions, please answer yes or no. In the past 12 months, did you buy food from fast food or pizza places? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ536Multiple dataset contexts
At the last fast food or pizza place you bought foods or beverages, did you notice any calorie information on the menu?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- At the last fast food or pizza place you bought foods or beverages, did you notice any calorie information on the menu? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — At the last fast food or pizza place you bought foods or beverages, did you notice any calorie information on the menu? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — At the last fast food or pizza place you bought foods or beverages, did you notice any calorie information on the menu? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ541Multiple dataset contexts
Did you use the information in deciding what to buy?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Did you use the information in deciding what to buy? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — Did you use the information in deciding what to buy? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — Did you use the information in deciding what to buy? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ551Multiple dataset contexts
In the past 12 months, did you eat in or get take-out from a restaurant with waiter or waitress service?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- In the past 12 months, did you eat in or get take-out from a restaurant with waiter or waitress service? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — In the past 12 months, did you eat in or get take-out from a restaurant with waiter or waitress service? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — In the past 12 months, did you eat in or get take-out from a restaurant with waiter or waitress service? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ581Multiple dataset contexts
The last time you ate or got take-out from a restaurant with a waiter or waitress, did you notice any calorie information on the menu?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- The last time you ate or got take-out from a restaurant with a waiter or waitress, did you notice any calorie information on the menu? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — The last time you ate or got take-out from a restaurant with a waiter or waitress, did you notice any calorie information on the menu? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — The last time you ate or got take-out from a restaurant with a waiter or waitress, did you notice any calorie information on the menu? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ586Multiple dataset contexts
Did you use the information in deciding what to order?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Did you use the information in deciding what to order? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — Did you use the information in deciding what to order? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — Did you use the information in deciding what to order? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ596Indexed code and label stable
Next I'm going to ask a few questions about the nutritional guidelines recommended for Americans by the federal government. {Have you/Has SP} heard of My Plate?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- Next I'm going to ask a few questions about the nutritional guidelines recommended for Americans by the federal government. {Have you/Has SP} heard of My Plate? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_DBQ — Next I'm going to ask a few questions about the nutritional guidelines recommended for Americans by the federal government. {Have you/Has SP} heard of My Plate? — Diet Behavior & Nutrition (Questionnaire)
CBQ606Indexed code and label stable
{Have you/Has SP} looked up the My Plate plan on the internet?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Have you/Has SP} looked up the My Plate plan on the internet? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_DBQ — {Have you/Has SP} looked up the My Plate plan on the internet? — Diet Behavior & Nutrition (Questionnaire)
CBQ611Indexed code and label stable
{Have you/Has SP} tried to follow the recommendations in the My Plate plan?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Have you/Has SP} tried to follow the recommendations in the My Plate plan? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_DBQ — {Have you/Has SP} tried to follow the recommendations in the My Plate plan? — Diet Behavior & Nutrition (Questionnaire)
CBQ645Indexed code and label stable
{Please turn to hand card 2.} About how many calories do you think a {man/woman} of your age and physical activity needs to consume a day to maintain your current weight?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 1
- Datasets
- 1
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Please turn to hand card 2.} About how many calories do you think a {man/woman} of your age and physical activity needs to consume a day to maintain your current weight? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {Please turn to hand card 2.} About how many calories do you think a {man/woman} of your age and physical activity needs to consume a day to maintain your current weight? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
CBQ685Multiple dataset contexts
{Please turn to hand cards 16 and 17.} How about the information on the percent daily value? [How often do you use information on the percent daily value on a food label, {such as the part colored in blue on hand card 16,} when deciding to buy a food product?] [Would you say always, most of the time, sometimes, rarely, or never?]
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Please turn to hand cards 16 and 17.} How about the information on the percent daily value? [How often do you use information on the percent daily value on a food label, {such as the part colored in blue on hand card 16,} when deciding to buy a food product?] [Would you say always, most of the time, sometimes, rarely, or never?] — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {Please turn to hand cards 16 and 17.} How about the information on the percent daily value? [How often do you use information on the percent daily value on a food label, {such as the part colored in blue on hand card 16,} when deciding to buy a food product?] [Would you say always, most of the time, sometimes, rarely, or never?] — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {Please turn to hand cards 16 and 17.} How about the information on the percent daily value? [How often do you use information on the percent daily value on a food label, {such as the part colored in blue on hand card 16,} when deciding to buy a food product?] [Would you say always, most of the time, sometimes, rarely, or never?] — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ695aMultiple dataset contexts
{Now turn to {hand cards 38 and 39/hand cards 40 and 41}.} Again, for this next question you may give more than one answer. Now think about the "serving size" on a food label. What does serving size mean to you? Serving size is...
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Now turn to {hand cards 38 and 39/hand cards 40 and 41}.} Again, for this next question you may give more than one answer. Now think about the "serving size" on a food label. What does serving size mean to you? Serving size is... — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {Now turn to {hand cards 38 and 39/hand cards 40 and 41}.} Again, for this next question you may give more than one answer. Now think about the "serving size" on a food label. What does serving size mean to you? Serving size is... — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {Now turn to {hand cards 38 and 39/hand cards 40 and 41}.} Again, for this next question you may give more than one answer. Now think about the "serving size" on a food label. What does serving size mean to you? Serving size is... — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ695bMultiple dataset contexts
{Now turn to {hand cards 38 and 39/hand cards 40 and 41}.} Again, for this next question you may give more than one answer. Now think about the "serving size" on a food label. What does serving size mean to you? Serving size is...
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Now turn to {hand cards 38 and 39/hand cards 40 and 41}.} Again, for this next question you may give more than one answer. Now think about the "serving size" on a food label. What does serving size mean to you? Serving size is... — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {Now turn to {hand cards 38 and 39/hand cards 40 and 41}.} Again, for this next question you may give more than one answer. Now think about the "serving size" on a food label. What does serving size mean to you? Serving size is... — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {Now turn to {hand cards 38 and 39/hand cards 40 and 41}.} Again, for this next question you may give more than one answer. Now think about the "serving size" on a food label. What does serving size mean to you? Serving size is... — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ695cMultiple dataset contexts
{Now turn to {hand cards 38 and 39/hand cards 40 and 41}.} Again, for this next question you may give more than one answer. Now think about the "serving size" on a food label. What does serving size mean to you? Serving size is...
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Now turn to {hand cards 38 and 39/hand cards 40 and 41}.} Again, for this next question you may give more than one answer. Now think about the "serving size" on a food label. What does serving size mean to you? Serving size is... — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {Now turn to {hand cards 38 and 39/hand cards 40 and 41}.} Again, for this next question you may give more than one answer. Now think about the "serving size" on a food label. What does serving size mean to you? Serving size is... — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {Now turn to {hand cards 38 and 39/hand cards 40 and 41}.} Again, for this next question you may give more than one answer. Now think about the "serving size" on a food label. What does serving size mean to you? Serving size is... — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ698aMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ698bMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ698cMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ698cdMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ698dMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ698eMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ698fMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ698gMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ698hMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ698iMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you rarely or never check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 36/hand card 37}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ700Multiple dataset contexts
{Now turn the page to use hand card 3.} Many food packages contain an expiration date such as "use by" or "sell by". How often do you use the expiration date when deciding to buy a food product? Would you say always, most of the time, sometimes, rarely, or never?
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {Now turn the page to use hand card 3.} Many food packages contain an expiration date such as "use by" or "sell by". How often do you use the expiration date when deciding to buy a food product? Would you say always, most of the time, sometimes, rarely, or never? — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {Now turn the page to use hand card 3.} Many food packages contain an expiration date such as "use by" or "sell by". How often do you use the expiration date when deciding to buy a food product? Would you say always, most of the time, sometimes, rarely, or never? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {Now turn the page to use hand card 3.} Many food packages contain an expiration date such as "use by" or "sell by". How often do you use the expiration date when deciding to buy a food product? Would you say always, most of the time, sometimes, rarely, or never? — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ738aMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ738bMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ738cMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ738cdMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ738dMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)
CBQ738eMultiple dataset contexts
{What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.}
- Observed years
- 2017–2020
- Release records
- 2
- Datasets
- 2
- Components
- Questionnaire
Qualified harmonization assessment unavailable
Praxis has not returned a qualified current-snapshot assessment for this variable. Do not infer cross-cycle equivalence from catalog or enrichment evidence alone.
Variable names / labels over time
- {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — 2017-2020
Cycle-by-cycle release history
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFA — {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module - Adult (Questionnaire)
- 2017-2020: P_CBQPFC — {What is the reason or reasons that you check the food label when deciding to buy a food product? There are some examples on {hand card 34/hand card 35}. You may give more than one answer.} — Consumer Behavior Phone Follow-up Module – Child (Questionnaire)