Praxis Research Guide · PRG-001

The IMRaD Research Paper

A practical framework for a clear, reproducible scientific manuscript.

Audience
Researchers, postgraduate students, analysts, and scientific writers
Reviewed
Format
One-page PDF · US Letter

Guide overview

The essential idea

IMRaD organizes a research paper around the logic of inquiry: why the study was needed, how it was conducted, what it found, and what those findings mean. This guide helps writers keep those four parts aligned.

Practical framework

What to apply

Introduction: establish the need

The introduction should lead the reader from the research problem to one precise objective, question, or hypothesis.

  • Define the problem, population, or phenomenon and explain why it matters.
  • Synthesize only the prior evidence needed to identify the unresolved gap.
  • End with an objective that can be traced through the methods, results, and conclusion.

Methods: make the work inspectable

Methods should contain enough detail to evaluate bias, understand analytical decisions, and reproduce the work where possible.

  • State the design, setting, dates, sampling, eligibility, variables, and procedures.
  • Explain sample-size reasoning, missing-data handling, sensitivity analyses, and software.
  • Document ethics, consent, registration, data access, and protocol deviations as applicable.

Results: report before interpreting

Results provide a factual account of the completed analysis in the same order established in the methods.

  • Show participant or observation flow, exclusions, and the final analytical sample.
  • Report effect estimates with uncertainty, denominators, and units rather than p-values alone.
  • Use tables and figures to add information instead of duplicating every value in prose.

Discussion: explain what the findings mean

The discussion interprets magnitude, precision, limitations, and practical meaning without overstating certainty.

  • Relate the principal finding directly to the stated objective.
  • Compare the result with prior evidence and distinguish evidence from inference.
  • Close with proportionate implications and the next useful research or practice step.

Before you finish

A short quality review

  1. Every objective has a matching method, result, and proportionate conclusion.
  2. Every reported outcome and analysis was defined in the methods.
  3. Denominators, units, uncertainty, exclusions, and missingness are visible.
  4. The language reflects the design and limits of generalization.

Most papers end the Discussion with a concise concluding paragraph. Conclusion is commonly present, but it is not a separate letter in the IMRaD acronym unless the journal requires a distinct section.

Authoritative sources

Continue with the primary guidance