Praxis Data Lab · Study Builder

Build your NHANES study with harmonization intelligence.

Combine variables from the indexed Continuous NHANES catalog, choose the cycles you need, and see how Praxis connects source history, methods, cycle boundaries, and cross-code lineage into a study-specific harmonization view.

4variables selected
Praxis identified a method boundary to address

Praxis found a material transition in the selected span and has identified the affected variables so the study can apply the appropriate adjustment.

4 variable assessments

ACD010C
Compatible with harmonizationmoderate confidence

Questionnaire

What language(s) {do you/does SP} usually speak at home?

Source releases
7
Available cycles
1999-2000 · 2001-2002 · 2003-2004 · 2005-2006 · 2007-2008 · 2009-2010 · 2021-2023
Dataset
Acculturation

No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.

Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence

Evidence signals: source-derived · automated-difference

Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2021-2023

Praxis harmonization actions
  • Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
  • Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
  • Confirm that the construct and coding are unchanged before pooling or recoding.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
ARXO2WD
Evidence developinglow confidence

Examination

OCCIPUT-TO-WALL DISTANCE IN CENTIMETERS

Source releases
1
Available cycles
2009-2010
Dataset
Arthritis Body Measures

No normalized longitudinal change evidence is available for this variable. Absence of events must not be interpreted as proof of cross-cycle equivalence.

Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence

AUDTYL22
Compatible with harmonizationmoderate confidence

Examination

Tympanometry-Left Ear, Measurement 22

Source releases
7
Available cycles
1999-2000 · 2001-2002 · 2003-2004 · 2005-2006 · 2007-2008 · 2009-2010 · 2011-2012
Dataset
Audiometry - Tympanometry

No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.

Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence

Evidence signals: source-derived · automated-difference

Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012

Praxis harmonization actions
  • Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
  • Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
  • Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
GTDCODE
Adjustment requiredhigh confidence

Laboratory

Incomplete OGTT Comment Code

Source releases
5
Available cycles
2007-2008 · 2009-2010 · 2011-2012 · 2013-2014 · 2015-2016
Dataset
Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

A methodological discontinuity falls inside the selected cycle span. Naive pooling of raw values across the flagged boundary is not recommended unless CDC/NCHS provides a defensible calibration or comparability procedure.

Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence

Evidence signals: source-derived · automated-difference · source-stated

Relevant boundaries: 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016

Praxis harmonization actions
  • Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
  • Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
  • Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
  • Apply CDC/NCHS comparability or calibration guidance where available. If equivalence is not established, preserve separate method periods or perform sensitivity analyses rather than naively pooling raw values.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence