Data intelligence · automation · analyticsA Praxis Global Institute platform
Praxis Data Lab

Praxis Data Lab · Study Builder

Build your NHANES study with harmonization intelligence.

Combine variables from the indexed Continuous NHANES catalog, choose the cycles you need, and see how Praxis connects source history, methods, cycle boundaries, and cross-code lineage into a study-specific harmonization view.

2variables selected
Praxis identified a method boundary to address

Praxis found a material transition in the selected span and has identified the affected variables so the study can apply the appropriate adjustment.

2 variable assessments

AUDTYL29
Compatible with harmonizationmoderate confidence

Examination

Tympanometry-Left Ear, Measurement 29

Source releases
7
Available cycles
1999-2000 · 2001-2002 · 2003-2004 · 2005-2006 · 2007-2008 · 2009-2010 · 2011-2012
Dataset
Audiometry - Tympanometry

No blocking method discontinuity is identified inside the selected cycle span, but one or more longitudinal changes require explicit harmonization conditions before pooling.

Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence

Evidence signals: source-derived · automated-difference

Relevant boundaries: 1999-2000 → 2001-2002 · 2001-2002 → 2003-2004 · 2003-2004 → 2005-2006 · 2005-2006 → 2007-2008 · 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012

Praxis harmonization actions
  • Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
  • Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
  • Apply cycle-specific eligibility rules and restrict the pooled analytic population to a defensible common target population.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Remove from studyVariable historyCDC source
GTDCODE
Adjustment requiredhigh confidence

Laboratory

Incomplete OGTT Comment Code

Source releases
5
Available cycles
2007-2008 · 2009-2010 · 2011-2012 · 2013-2014 · 2015-2016
Dataset
Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

A methodological discontinuity falls inside the selected cycle span. Naive pooling of raw values across the flagged boundary is not recommended unless CDC/NCHS provides a defensible calibration or comparability procedure.

Evidence provenance: Praxis automated inference from indexed CDC/NCHS evidence

Evidence signals: source-derived · automated-difference · source-stated

Relevant boundaries: 2007-2008 → 2009-2010 · 2009-2010 → 2011-2012 · 2011-2012 → 2013-2014 · 2013-2014 → 2015-2016

Praxis harmonization actions
  • Verify merge grain, companion variables, and component-specific analytic guidance for the new file context.
  • Review the adjacent codebooks/methods. Keep this boundary as documentation variation unless source evidence confirms a substantive method or instrument change.
  • Select the weight appropriate to each cycle and subsample; when pooling cycles, construct the combined weight according to NHANES guidance rather than reusing a single-cycle weight unchanged.
  • Apply CDC/NCHS comparability or calibration guidance where available. If equivalence is not established, preserve separate method periods or perform sensitivity analyses rather than naively pooling raw values.
Supporting CDC/NCHS evidence
Remove from studyVariable historyCDC source